The rise, fall, and re-orientation of ERP Many successful small companies
have crumbled after becoming too big too soon. Without proper adaptation
to the management structure, a growing company may very well have its
growth stunted under an increased workload. Enterprise Resource Planning
(ERP) is the answer. Simply put, ERP is a complex series of intertwined
programs that work in conjunction to help a company run smoothly. The
inventory tracking system of a small company may only involve updating a
couple of spreadsheets, but something this simplistic a task at a large
company would be next to impossible. Of course, there are several
software packages available that are capable of tracking inventory for
the largest enterprises. What separates an ERP solution from these
solutions is ERP's ability to have each department collaborate with the
others and thereby make operations more efficient. Since ERP solutions
allow jobs to be completed more efficiently, companies also can lower
their overheads because fewer people will be required to do the same
job.
That, in essence, is the captivating attraction of ERP that most
companies succumbed to and embraced. Grand plans involving huge budgets
and extraordinarily long time frames were set-up to implement ERP
systems that after being implemented was supposed to save money apart
from providing a number of other benefits. For a long while everything
seemed fine. But soon, to most companies, the realization struck. The
big bang, it turned out, was often a big dud, frequently resulting in
ERP systems that took too long to implement, cost too much, and
delivered too few benefits.
While investing in ERP systems was a good idea for most companies, many
failed to achieve the business goals for which they were put in place.
The integration shortfalls relate to a lack of managerial,
organizational, and technical cohesiveness.
iSeed ERP Solutions division has been involved in implementing
enterprise applications for customers for more than ten years. Our
approach to enterprise application implementation has been very
different. The first thing we convince our customers is to forget the
so-called big-bang approach to ERP deployment, in which companies do all
their customization up front, then roll out their ERP systems all at
once. A growing contingent of users understood our philosophy and
started discovering that less customization was better when deploying
ERP systems, especially at the beginning of a project. By not
customizing during implementation, ERP projects are more likely to be
completed on time and within budget. After the ERP system is installed,
programmers can write code that adds functionality and features to the
packaged system as well as integrate the new ERP infrastructure with
existing systems and best-of-breed applications.
This approach in our strategy came about for several reasons. We noticed
that IT organizations had grown frustrated by the long lead times it
took to implement ERP systems. At the largest companies, ERP deployments
took an average of 23 months. Companies wanted to shorten the
time-to-benefit. Concentrating too much on customizations, users were
falling behind in upgrades. And not keeping up with upgrades were having
serious repercussions. The ERP customer base was changing, too. In the
past, major companies often combined ERP deployments with extensive
business process reengineering efforts, causing their ERP deployments to
stretch out for years. Today, however, companies with annual revenue as
low as $25 million are installing ERP systems. These companies aren't
doing business process reengineering, but are after other benefits such
as greater scalability or easier access to centralized databases. Many
of the new breed of ERP users did not want to or could not take years to
get up and running.
We have also noticed that over the years ERP vendors have been quick to
understand this shift in priorities of users and today's ERP software
tends to be feature and function rich and addresses a broad spectrum of
application needs, from financials and HR through supply chain and
customer service and support. The trend toward less customization
doesn't mean that we are recommending users to abandon it altogether; we
are just advising them to get more selective. For the most part, vendors
have incorporated industry-standard best practices into ERP software; in
fact, today's ERP suites are sometimes called "companies-in-a-box." This
is especially true for financial applications, so it makes little sense
to customize those apps. Companies are turning their customization
efforts to outward or customer-facing applications, such as
customer-relationship management, and not spending the time and effort
on inward-facing applications.
We also advise our customers to take an incremental approach to
implement an ERP suite, starting with programs that need the least
customization, such as financials, order entry and management, and
procurement applications. Once they're running, users can implement more
difficult applications. Doing the easy applications first builds
momentum, proves the benefits, and thus garners support from user
departments and senior management. The most profound change in ERP
customization isn't that users are doing less of it, but that they view
it as a continuous process.
ERP SOFTWARE AND BUSINESS
On the flip side our work as an implementer and system integrator is
getting more difficult since, as ERP vendors face stiff competition on
the E-commerce, supply-chain, and customer-relationship management
front, they are rushing new products and releases out the door. ERP
software vendors are also late to the Web commerce game. Now, they're
making up for their tardiness with a host of product introductions aimed
at turning their systems into infrastructures for E-business. Due to
this there is concern in the industry and systems integrators like us
that many new products may not go through proper steps of quality
control, beta testing, and consultant training.
We believe that the ERP vendors have some major obstacles to overcome
before they can become primary providers of E-business applications.
They face stiff competition from nimble startups; their strategies are
unproven; and the complexity of their systems may make them poorly
suited for the rapidly changing environment of E-business. What's more,
many of their E-business products are still in development. ERP vendors'
strength is in automating companies' internal operations, but the focus
of E-business is external - on customers and suppliers. Also ERP vendors
have yet to prove that they can deliver on their promise of integrating
E-business applications with their back-office apps. Few IT managers
seem to even think of ERP companies when shopping for E-business
software and systems. One concern IT managers have with ERP vendors as
E-business partners is their ability to modify their systems to respond
to changing business models and support new processes inherent in doing
business on the Web. E-commerce processes, such as build-to-order
production, one-to-one marketing, and online customer service are new to
ERP systems. ERP systems aren't easy to reconfigure as business
processes change.
POSITIONING ERP SOFTWARE AS BUSINESS FULFILLMENT SYSTEMS:
This is where we come in. With our expertise in enterprise application
implementation as well as expertise in what we call as "gluing
technology", we are able to take the best of both worlds and provide a
highly effective solution using heterogeneous components.
ERP software is still very strong where the recent crop of e-business
software vendors are still found wanting. That is in the back-end
fulfillment systems for e-businesses. Although the e-business
front-office applications provide excellent relationship management to
the external world, the critical area is actually in the fulfillment and
logistics. This information is sitting internal to the company. Where
front-office applications are failing is what to do once the order is
received? Without proper control and information on inventory, shipping,
delivery, and other logistics the entire purpose of e-business is left
redundant. This is exactly what ERP software does best and we believe
this is its rightful place in any enterprise. We provide the critical
success factor of delivering the seamless integration of the e-business
and ERP software to provide an end-to-end solution for business in the
e-commerce era. This is how our ERP practice has evolved into the
eBusiness BackOffice practice and we bring the same commitment of
"Responsible Consulting" into this practice.
As companies come to rely heavily on their ERP systems, the need for
systems that are flexible and easy to customize will become the norm.
That will make an ERP software vendor's development and customization
tools a more important selection criteria than they are today. We
encourage our customers to cast aside the notion that ERP software is a
fixed IT asset and view it as living, evolving systems.
iSeed BUSINESS BACKOFFICE TEN GUIDELINES FOR ERP SYSTEMS
IMPLEMENTATION:
Prepare ROI (Return-on-Investment) calculations and business
justifications prior to commencing implementation.
Map out business processes and business process changes before
commencement of implementation.
Freeze on functionality and features and prepare project plan that does
not allow for expansion of the same.
Plan to roll out applications one module at a time to minimize pain and
maximize business returns
Take note of future integration needs, including integrating with
e-business software, apart from features while selecting platform.
Ensure implementation milestones by even compromising on some not so
critical features.
Don't customize unless absolutely necessary; be willing to adopt
application best practices
Solicit user participation at every stage and act on user feedback
Ensure that the business side takes ownership of an application
Focus on training
iSeed Business BackOffice practice is committed to provide its business
functional knowledge and its technical expertise for complete ERP
systems implementations and the interfacing with modern day e-business
systems. iSeed is a non-biased recommender of tools, platforms and
products and uses best of breed and the most suitable platforms and
products in its implementations and application integration. |